The first round included cutbacks in nursery education,
youth provision, meals on wheels, libraries and day centres.
Cabinet meetings are of course open to the public, and
members of the public are invited to submit requests to speak if they have a
relevant interest. So as someone with a
relevant interest I did just that.
I am Chair of the Cwmclydach Development Trust which runs a
Day Nursery – our business could be directly affected by the decision
made. I am Vice Chair of Governors at a
secondary school – our E3 provision will be affected by the withdrawal of transport,
and we anticipate that our homework clubs will suffer as a result.
I have an interest, albeit less directly, in Clydach Vale
Boys and Girls Club where the youth club is currently based – plans to remove funding
for it will certainly have an effect on provision there. The building may
become unsustainable and as it currently houses our holiday play schemes then
it will affect our Trust.
Yet, surprise, surprise, today I received an email which
states:
Dear Ms.Roberts,
The Cabinet Office has already received a number of requests to contribute to the meeting.
Your request has been considered by the Chair and it is felt that you do not have a relevant interest in the matters being discussed.
The Cabinet Office has already received a number of requests to contribute to the meeting.
Your request has been considered by the Chair and it is felt that you do not have a relevant interest in the matters being discussed.
So Deputy Leader Paul Cannon, whom I presume is still in the driving seat
owing to the Leader’s illness, has decided that I do not have a relevant
interest. Really? How much more relevant could it get then?
Maybe they are scared that myself and others actually know more than they
do about some of the subjects under discussion.
If the public report is anything to go by then that wouldn’t be
difficult.
A cynic may well think that Cllr Cannon is simply playing political games,
which given the seriousness of the proposals is indeed sad. From a political viewpoint it is also quite
stupid.
You see, whatever I was going to say regarding childcare
provision and youth provision I can say to a much wider audience anyway via
social media. So should I be looking to score political points from that then I
can do so fairly easily. What this
frankly daft decision does is now give the opportunity to point out to everyone
exactly how undemocratic the Labour Cabinet are.
Politically it shows a marked naivety. Maybe they should be looking for some better
strategic advice on the subject. Scared,
stupid or simply stubborn – probably all three.
5 comments:
My point would be that the least amount of public money that can sensibly be spent should be. That said completely agree with your argument. Well said, well made
I am not sure why I am suddenly anonymous. Have to have a look at my set-up. Sorry.
I said - They do not want the electorate and surely not opposition members to voice any opinion(s). I believe amongst a thousand others that the decisions have already been made. These consultations only serve one purpose - to keep us quiet and submissive in the belief that Labour is the one and only saviour of the working class. Indeed, some saviour. My money is on the donkey in the next field.
So who is the saviour of the working class? The Lib Dems? Oh sorry you don't agree with them either do you?
The saviour of the working class? That is a dream which will always be a dream when there are those who cannot distinguish between what is in the public interest and what is their own. Your anonymous message shows quite clearly that you don't know either. But hey what's different?
Post a Comment